Povezanost med pogostostjo uporabe virov informacij o covidu-19 in nagnjenostjo k teorijam zarot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55707/jhs.v9i2.128Ključne besede:
covid-19, teorije zarot, viri informacij, infodemijaPovzetek
Med pandemijo covida-19 so ljudje soočeni z veliko količino (ne)preverjenih informacij, pri čemer se različni komunikacijski kanali med seboj razlikujejo tudi po tem, da lahko nekateri širijo lažne informacije in teorije zarot. Med posamezniki pa se razlikuje tudi stopnja dovzetnosti za teorije zarot. Ker lahko tako nagnjenost k teorijam zarot kot izbor virov informacij vodita v (ne)upoštevanje (javno) zdravstvenih priporočil in spodkopavanje znanstvenih dognanj, je raziskovanje navedenih področij še
toliko pomembnejše za čim učinkovitejše naslavljanje infodemije v celostnih prizadevanjih za zajezitev pandemije. V naši raziskavi nakazana negativna povezanost med pogostostjo uporabe uradnih zdravstvenih in vladnih institucij kot virov informacij o covidu-19 ter nagnjenostjo k teorijam zarot, negativna povezanost med pogostostjo uporabe tradicionalnih medijev in nagnjenostjo k teorijam zarot ter neznatna pozitivna povezanost med pogostostjo uporabe družbenih omrežij in nagnjenostjo k teorijam zarot kot edina pozitivna povezanost v naši študiji zato predstavljajo pomembne informacije za strokovnjake s področja javnega zdravja in komuniciranja.
Literatura
Ali, S. H., Foreman, J., Tozan, Y. idr. (2020). Trends and predictors of Covid-19 information sources and their relationship with knowledge and beliefs related to the pandemic: Nationwide cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/21071
Allington, D., Duffy, B., Wessely, S. idr. (2020). Health-protective behaviour, social media usage, and conspiracy belief during the Covid-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine, 51(10), 1763–1769. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000224X
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D. idr. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/IJPOR/EDR032
Bantimaroudis, P., Sideri, M., Ballas, D. idr. (2020). Conspiracism on social media: An agenda melding of group-mediated deceptions. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 16(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1386/MACP_00020_1
Barua, Z., Barua, S., Aktar, S. idr. (2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 8(100119). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S. idr. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Loewen, P. J. idr. (2020). The causes and consequences of COVID-19 misperceptions: Understanding the role of news and social media. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/MR-2020-028
Brondi, S., Pellegrini, G., Guráň, P. idr. (2021). Dimensions of trust in different forms of science communication: the role of information sources and channels used to acquire science knowledge. Journal of Science Communication, 20(3), A08. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030208
Chong, Y. Y., Cheng, H. Y., Chan, H. Y. L. idr. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic, infodemic and the role of eHealth literacy. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108(103644).. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103644
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A. idr. (2020). The Covid-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-020-73510-5
Datareportal. (2022). DIGITAL 2022: SLOVENIA.
De Coninck, D., Frissen, T., Matthijs, K. idr. (2021). Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation About Covid-19: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Anxiety, Depression and Exposure to and Trust in Information Sources. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646394
De Coninck, D., Frissen, T., Matthijs, K. idr. (2021). Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation About Covid-19: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Anxiety, Depression and Exposure to and Trust in Information Sources. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2021.646394/FULL
Depoux, A., Martin, S., Karafillakis, E. idr. (2020). The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the Covid-19 outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa031
Dudo, A., Brossard, D., Shanahan, J. idr. (2010). Science on Television in the 21st Century: Recent Trends in Portrayals and Their Contributions to Public Attitudes Toward Science. SAGE Journals, 38(6), 754–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384988
Duplaga, M. (2020). The determinants of conspiracy beliefs related to the Covid-19 pandemic in a nationally representative sample of internet users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217818
Entradas, M. (2021). In Science We Trust: The Effects of Information Sources on Covid-19 Risk Perceptions. Health Communication, 37 (14), 1715–1723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1914915
Evropska komisija. (2020). Boj proti dezinformacijam v zvezi s covid-19 – kaj je res in kaj ne. Dostopno na: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020JC0008.
Ferligoj, A., Leskošek, K. in Kogovšek, T. (1995). Zanesljivost in veljavnost merjenja: Metodološki zvezki 10. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede Univerze v Ljubljani.
Frischlich, L. in Humprecht, E. (2021). Trust, Democratic Resilience, and the Infodemic. Israel: Public policy institute.
Frischlish, L. (2019). Kritische Medienkompetenz als Säule demokratischer Resilienz in Zeiten von “Fake News” und Online-Desinformation. Israel: Public policy institute. Dostopno na: https://www.bpb.de/themen/medien-journalismus/digitale-desinformation/290527/kritischemedienkompetenz-als-saeule-demokratischer-resilienz-in-zeiten-von-fake-news-und-onlinedesinformation/.
Gerts, D., Shelley, C. D., Parikh, N. idr. (2021). “Thought I’d share first”: An analysis of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and misinformation spread on twitter. JMIR Public Health Surveil, 7(4). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.2196/26527
Grimes, D. R. (2021). Medical disinformation and the unviable nature of Covid-19 conspiracy theories. PLoS ONE, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245900
Hameleers, M., Powell, T. E., Van Der Meer, T. G. L. A. idr. (2020). A Picture Paints a Thousand Lies? The Effects and Mechanisms of Multimodal Disinformation and Rebuttals Disseminated via Social Media. Political Communication, 37(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1674979
Hartley, K. in Vu, M. K. (2020). Fighting fake news in the Covid-19 era: policy insights from an equilibrium model. Policy Sciences, 53(4), 735–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09405-z
Heiss, R., Gell, S., Röthlingshöfer, E. idr. (2021). How threat perceptions relate to learning and conspiracy beliefs about Covid-19: Evidence from a panel study. Personality and Individual Differences, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110672
Hočevar Grom, A., Belščak Čolaković, A., Rehberger, M. idr. (2021a). Presečna Nacionalna raziskava o vplivu pandemije na življenje (SI-PANDA) 2021.
Hočevar Grom, A., Belščak Čolaković, A. idr. (2021b). Raziskava o vplivu pandemije na življenje (SI-PANDA) 2020/2021, panelna raziskava, 5. izvedba. Dostopno na: https://www.nijz.si/sl/raziskava-o-vplivu-pandemije-na-zivljenje-si-panda-20202021.
Hočevar Grom, A., Belščak Čolaković, A., Rehberger, M. idr. (2021c). Raziskava o vplivu pandemije na življenje (SI-PANDA) 2020/2021, panelna raziskava, 7. izvedba. Dostopno na: https://www.nijz.si/sl/raziskava-o-vplivu-pandemije-na-zivljenje-si-panda-20202021.
Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H. idr. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097
Humprecht, E., Esser, F. in Van Aelst, P. (2020). Resilience to Online Disinformation: A Framework for Cross-National Comparative Research. SAGE Journals, 25(3), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219900126
Ipsos European Public Affairs. (2021). Flash Eurobarometer 494 Attitudes on vaccination against Covid-19. Dostopno na: file:///C:/Users/JZagar/Downloads/fl_494_en.cleaned.pdf
Jolley, D. in Douglas, K. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
Kelly Garrett, R. (2019). Social media’s contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213500. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0213500
Klein, O. in Nera, K. (2020). Social Psychology of Conspiracy Theories. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, 121–134. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-1_9
Kleis Nielsen, R., Fletcher, R., Newman, N. idr. (2020). Navigating the “Infodemic”: How People in Six Countries Access and Rate News and Information about Coronavirus.
Kouzy, R., Jaoude, J. A., Kraitem, A. idr. (2020). Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter. Cureus, 12(3), e7255–e7255. https://doi.org/10.7759/CUREUS.7255
LaRose, R. (2010). The Problem of Media Habits. Communication Theory, 20(2), 194–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2885.2010.01360.X
Lorenz - Spreen, P. (2021). Human Cognition and Online Behavior During the First Social Media Pandemic Breaking Down the Psychology of Online Information Consumption in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Israel: Public policy institute.
Mahl, D., Schäfer, M. S., & Zeng, J. (2022). Conspiracy theories in online environments: An interdisciplinary literature review and agenda for future research. SAGE Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221075759
March, E. in Springer. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy. PLOS ONE, 14(12), e0225964. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0225964
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A. in Kossowska, M. (2018). Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/EJSP.2308
Margolis, M. A., Brewer, N. T., Shah, P. D. idr. (2019). Stories about HPV vaccine in social media, traditional media, and conversations. Preventive Medicine, 118, 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YPMED.2018.11.005
Mede, N. (2022). Legacy media as inhibitors and drivers of public reservations against science: global survey evidence on the link between media use and anti-science attitudes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01058-y
Mertens, G., Gerritsen, L., Duijndam, S. idr. (2020). Fear of the coronavirus (Covid-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74(102258). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102258
Mheidly, N. in Fares, J. (2020). Leveraging media and health communication strategies to overcome the Covid-19 infodemic. Journal of Public Health Policy, 41(4), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41271-020-00247-W
Millson, J. (n. d.). Conspiracy Theories – 1000-Word Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Dostopno na: https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2020/12/17/conspiracy-theories/ (pridobljeno 23. 5. 2021).
Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J. idr. (2016). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. SAGE Journals, 29(5), 584–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
Papakyriakopoulos, O., Medina Serrano, J. C. in Hegelich, S. (2020). The spread of Covid-19 conspiracy theories on social media and the effect of content moderation. The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, Special Issue on Covid-19 and Misinformation, 1. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-034
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y. idr. (2020). Fighting Covid-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
Piltch - Loeb, R., Savoia, E., Goldberg, B. idr. (2021). Examining the effect of information channel on Covid-19 vaccine acceptance. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0251095. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0251095
Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K. idr. (2019). Framing fast and slow: a dual processing account of multimodal framing effects. Media Psychology, 22(4), 572–600. Dostopno na: https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1476891/SUPPL_FILE/HMEP_A_1476891_SM9781.DOCX.
Ratzan, S. C., Sommariva, S. in Rauh, L. (2020). Enhancing global health communication during a crisis: lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic. PHRP, 30(2), e3022010. https://doi.org/10.17061/PHRP3022010
Romer, D. in Jamieson, K. H. (2020a). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of Covid-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine, 263 (113356). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2020.113356
Romer, D. in Jamieson, K. H. (2020b). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of Covid-19 in the U.S. Social Science and Medicine, 263(113356). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356
Rosenberg, H., Syed, S. in Rezaie, S. (2020). The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the Covid-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22(4), 418–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2020.361
Rubinelli, S., Purnat, T. D., Wihelm, E. idr. (2022). WHO competency framework for health authorities and institutions to manage infodemics: its development and features. Human Resources for Health, 20(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12960-022-00733-0/TABLES/3
Rutjens, B. T., van der Linden, S. in van der Lee, R. (2021). Science skepticism in times of Covid-19. SAGE Journals, 24(2), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220981415
Schafer, M. S. (2016). Mediated trust in science: concept, measurement and perspectives for the `science of science communication’. Journal of Science Communication, 15(5), C02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15050302
Sharma, D. C., Pathak, A., Chaurasia, R. N. idr. (2020). Fighting infodemic: Need for robust health journalism in India. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(5), 1445–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSX.2020.07.039
Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S. idr. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations, 19(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600
Šrol, J., Ballová Mikušková, E. idr. (2021). When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3798
Stecula, D. A. in Pickup, M. (2021). Social Media, Cognitive Reflection, and Conspiracy Beliefs. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 62. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPOS.2021.647957/BIBTEX
Sunstein, C. R. in Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures*. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9760.2008.00325.X
Tasnim, S., Hossain, M. in Mazumder, H. (2020). Impact of rumors and misinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 53(3), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.3961/JPMPH.20.094
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. (2020). Munich Security Conference. World Health Organization. Dostopno na https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/munich-security-conference.
Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z. idr. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the Covid-19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770
Theocharis, Y., Cardenal, A., Jin, S. idr. (2021). Does the platform matter? Social media and Covid-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in 17 countries. SAGA Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045666
Uscinski, J. E. (2018). Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them. Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 1–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844073.001.0001
Usher, K., Durkin, J. in Bhullar, N. (2020). The Covid-19 pandemic and mental health impacts. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(3), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12726
Valicon. (2021a). Raziskava #Novanormalnost, uporabljeni podatki iz več meritev v letu 2021. Dostopno na: https://www.valicon.net/sl/novanormalnost/
Valicon. (2021b). Raziskava Ogledalo Slovenije, 25. marec do 4. april 2022, n=1000; Valicon. Dostopno na: https://www.valicon.net/sl/2022/04/raziskava-ogledalo-slovenije-april-2022/
Van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories. Routledge.
Van Prooijen, J. W. (2017). Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301
Van Prooijen, J. W. in Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Vishwanath, A. (2015). Habitual Facebook Use and its Impact on Getting Deceived on Social Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCC4.12100
Viviani, M. in Pasi, G. (2017). Credibility in social media: opinions, news, and health information—a survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/WIDM.1209
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. in Aral, S. (2018a). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. in Aral, S. (2018b). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. in Aral, S. (2018c). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Vraga, E. K. in Bode, L. (2017). Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media. SAGE Journals, 39(5), 621–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776
Vraga, E. K., Bode, L. in Tully, M. (2020). Creating News Literacy Messages to Enhance Expert Corrections of Misinformation on Twitter. SAGE Journals, 49(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219898094
Vrdelja, M., Vrbovšek, S., Klopčič, V. idr. (2021). Facing the Growing Covid-19 Infodemic: Digital Health Literacy and Information-Seeking Behaviour of University Students in Slovenia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8507. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH18168507
Whitson, J. A. in Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1159845
Wonneberger, A., Schoenbach, K. in van Meurs, L. (2011). Interest in News and Politics—or Situational Determinants? Why People Watch the News. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.597466
Xiao, X., Borah, P. in Su, Y. (2021). The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs. Public Understanding of Science, 30(8), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521998025
Yu, X. in Li, N. (2021). Understanding the beginning of a pandemic: China’s response to the emergence of Covid-19. Journal of Infection and Public Health 14(3), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.12.024
Žagar, J., Vrdelja, M. in Rehberger, M. (2022a). Razširjenost nagnjenosti k teorijam zarot med različnimi skupinami v Sloveniji. V: Hočevar Grom, A., Jeriček Klanšček, H., Belščak Čolaković, A. idr. (Eds.). Kako smo v Sloveniji doživljali pandemijo covida-19? Izsledki presečnih raziskav SI-PANDA 2021. Ljubljana: Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje Slovenije.
Žagar, J., Vrdelja, M. in Rehberger, M. (2022b). Uporaba in zaupanje virom informacij o covidu-19 med različnimi populacijskimi skupinami v Sloveniji. V: Hočevar Grom, A., Jeriček Klanšček, H., Belščak Čolaković, A. idr. (Eds.). Kako smo v Sloveniji doživljali pandemijo covida-19? Izsledki presečnih raziskav SI-PANDA 2021. Ljubljana: Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje Slovenije.
Žagar, J., Vrdelja, M., Rehberger, M. idr. (2021). Nagnjenost k teorijam zarot v povezavi s covidom-19 med različnimi populacijskimi skupinami v Sloveniji. V: Gabrovec, B., Eržen, I., Trop Skaza, A. idr. (Eds.). Public Health and Covid-19. Ljubljana: Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje Slovenije.
Zhou, F., Yu, T., Du, R. idr. (2020). Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with Covid-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet, 395(10229), 1054–1062. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2022 Janina Žagar, Maruša Rehberger, Mitja Vrdelja
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
