Intergenerational Cooperation

Can Gardening Contribute to a More Effective Intergenerational Cooperation?

Authors

  • Cecilija Lebar
  • Tina Gatej
  • Tina Kirič
  • Aja Eva Rus

Keywords:

intergenerational cooperation, adolescents, elderly people, activity

Abstract

Intergenerational cooperation enables a better understanding and respect between generations, improves one’s self-image, strengthens mental and physical health, improves the communication between generations and brings a better quality of life. The purpose of the project presented in the paper was to connect a younger and an older generation by using a group activity. We wanted to find out if a week-long activity of gardening can alter the image one group has of the other, and learn what the participants gained in the activity. We used a qualitative research methodology and gathered information with the use of semi-constructed interviews that were carried out at the beginning and at the end of the week-long activity. There were seven participants – four elderly and three adolescent persons. Prior to the activity, the adolescents’ opinions on elderly people varied – some were positive, some negative, some even stereotypical. Familiarity with gardening was the key requirement to enter the project. During the activity the adolescents were paired up with the older persons. After the week-long activity, the adolescents have changed their opinions on the elderly population to a certain extent; they now perceive them less stereotypically. The adolescents gained a lot of knowledge and experience that enables a more successful intergenerational cooperation.

References

Blauth, C., McDaniel, J., Perrin, C. and Perrin, P. (2011). Age-based stereotypes: silent killer of collaboration and productivity. Achive Global, št. 2, str. 4.

Bučar Ručman, A. (2004). Nasilje in mladi. Ljubljana: Klub mladinski kulturni center Novo mesto.

Cambridge, J. and Simandiraki, A. (2005). Intractive intergenerational learning project. Final report, April, str. 3.

Cepin, M., Uršič, D., Hamler, L., Korošec, M., Mah, M. in Bernik, J. (2012). Medgeneracijsko sodelovanje v mladinskih organizacijah. Priročnik za vodje skupin in organizacij. Ljubljana: Zveza tabornikov Slovenije, Nacionalna skavtska organizacija, str. 12–13, 21–23, 35.

Cummings, S. M., Williams, M. N. and Ellis, R. A. (2003). Impact of an intergenerational program on 4th graders’ attitudes toward elders and school behaviour. Journal of human behavior in the social environment, 8, št. 1, str. 46.

Filipovič Hrast, M., Kogovšek, T. in Hlebec, V. (2005). Starostniki in njihova vpetost v sosedska omrežja. Družboslovne razprave, 21, št. 49/50, str. 205–221.

Hernandez, C. R. and Gonzalez, M. Z. (2008). Effects of intergenerational interaction on aging. Educational gerontology, 34, str. 292–305.

Hozjan, T. (2010). Aktualne dejavnosti na področju medgeneracijskega sodelovanja v Sloveniji. Andragoška spoznanja, 16, št. 4, str. 46–8.

Jarvis, P. (2001). Learning in later life: an introduction for educators & carers. London.

Jones, E. D., Herrick, C. and York, R. F. (2004). An intergenerational group benefits both emotionally disturbed youth and older adults. Issues in mental health nursing, 25, str. 754–5.

Kralj, A. (2009). Medgeneracijsko povezovanje. Pridobljeno dne 15. 4. 2014 s svetovnega spleta: http://www.ventilatorbesed.com/?opcija=kom_clanki&oce=64&id=176.

Kumelj, T. in Turk, B. (2000). Pojav socialne resničnosti. Psihološka obzorja, 9, št. 4, str. 78.

Kump, S. in Jelenc Krašovec, S. (2010). Medgeneracijsko sožitje in učenje. Pedagoško-andragoški dnevi 2010. Kulture v dialogu. Ljubljana.

Kump, S. in Jelenc Krašovec, S. (2010). Prestari za učenje? Vzorci izobraževanja in učenja starejših. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut.

Malačič, J. (2003). Demografija: teorija, analiza, metode in modeli. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta.

Mesec, B. (1998). Uvod v kvalitativno raziskovanje v socialnem delu. Ljubljana: Visoka šola za socialno delo.

Milligan, C., Gatrell, A. and Bingley, A. (2004). Cultivating health’: therapeutic landscapes and older people in northern England. Social Science & Medicine, 58, str. 1781–93.

Nelson, D. L. (1997). Why the Profession of Occupational therapy will Flourish in the 21st Century. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1, str. 11-23.

Pečjak, V. (1998). Psihologija tretjega življenjskega obdobja. Ljubljana: Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete Univerze.

Pihlar, T. (2012). Švicarsko poročilo o generacijah. Kakovostna starost, 15, št. 2.

Powell, J. A. and Arquitt, G. E. (1978). Getting the Generations Back Together: A Rationale for Development of Community Based Intergenerational Interaction Programs. The family coordiantior, str. 423.

Ramovš, J. (2005). Zdrava poznejša leta, naj bodo tudi lepa. Medčloveški in medgeneracijski odnosi – pogoj za kakovostna poznejša leta. Ljubljana: Inštitut Antona Trstenjaka za gerontologijo in medgeneracijsko sožitje.

Ramovš, J. (2012). Za kakovostno staranje in lepše sožitje med generacijami. Ljubljana: Inštitut Antona Trstenjaka za gerontologijo in medgeneracijsko sožitje.

Resman, V. (2013). Vpliv aktivnosti na kmetiji na kakovost življenja oseb z motnjami v duševnem razvoju. Diplomsko delo. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta.

Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.

Steinig, S. Y., Butts, D. M. (2010). Generations going green: intergenerational programs connecting young and old to improve our environment. Journal of the American society on aging, Winter 2009–2010, 33, št. 4, str. 64–9.

Published

2022-04-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Intergenerational Cooperation: Can Gardening Contribute to a More Effective Intergenerational Cooperation?. (2022). Revija Za Zdravstvene Vede, 2(1), 50-63. https://www.jhs.si/index.php/JHS/article/view/23

Most read articles by the same author(s)