Sources of Health Information, Ability to Assess its Credibility, and Interests in Health-Related Content

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55707/jhs.v13i1.199

Keywords:

adult education, critical thinking, public health, health literacy, reliability of health information

Abstract

Non-formal education represents an important context for the acquisition of health-related knowledge outside formal educational institutions and the structured healthcare system. In Slovenia, health-oriented non-formal educational programmes delivered by folk high schools enable adults to access health information while simultaneously supporting the development of critical thinking skills. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered via the online platform 1KA, and analysed through univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistical procedures. Online articles were identified as the most frequently used source of health information. The highest levels of perceived credibility were attributed to written professional sources and healthcare professionals, whereas social media and celebrity sources were rated as the least trustworthy. When evaluating the reliability of health information, the respondents prioritised factual accuracy, clarity, and source credibility. Four key thematic domains of interest emerged: nutrition, physical activity, management of health conditions, and mental health and personal development. The findings indicate a clear need for educational interventions that strengthen the critical evaluation of health information. 

References

1. Abraham, C., & Sheeran, P. (2015). The health belief model. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed., pp. 30–70). Open University Press

2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

3. Chen, X., Orom, H., Hay, J. L., Waters, E. A., Schofield, E., Li, Y., & Kiviniemi, M. T. (2019). Differences in rural and urban health information access and use. The Journal of Rural Health, 35(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12335

4. Chia, F., Huang, W. Y., Huang, H., & Wu, C. E. (2023). Promoting healthy behaviors in older adults to optimize health-promoting lifestyle: An intervention study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), Article 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021628

5. Cybulski, M., Krajewska-Kulak, E., & Jamiolkowski, J. (2015). Preferred health behaviors and quality of life of the elderly people in Poland. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 10, 1555–1564. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S92650

6. Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (2021). The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows. Public Health, 199, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.009

7. Dovžak, K., Bandelj, E., Dolgan, T., Grželj, A., Kump, S., Možina, E., Možina, T., Muršak, J., Perme, E., Radinovič Hajdič, M., Rozman Zgonc, B., & Žalec, N. (2020). Izhodišča za pripravo javnoveljavnih izobraževalnih programov za odrasle. Andragoški center Slovenije.

8. Ennis, R. H. (1985). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum. In A. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 54–57). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

9. Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

10. Fisher, W. A., Fisher, J. D., & Harman, J. (2003). The information-motivation-behavioral skills model: A general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 82–106). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753552.ch4

11. Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.

12. Kompare, A., & Rupnik Vec, T. (2016). Kako spodbujati razvoj mišljenja? Od temeljnih miselnih procesov do argumentiranja. Zavod RS za šolstvo.

13. Marks, D. F., Murray, M., & Estacio, E. V. (2021). Health psychology: Theory, research and practice (6th ed.). SAGE.

14. Musaiger, A. O., & Al-Hazzaa, H. M. (2012). Prevalence and risk factors associated with nutritionrelated noncommunicable diseases in the Eastern Mediterranean region. International Journal of General Medicine, 5, 199–217. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S29663

15. Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259

16. Ou, M., & Ho, S. S. (2024). Factors associated with information credibility perceptions: A meta-analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(2), 346–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231222556

17. Ou, M., & Ho, S. S. (2023). Does knowledge make a difference? Understanding how the lay public and experts assess the credibility of information on novel foods. Public Understanding of Science, 33(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231191348

18. Paul, R., Binker, A. J. A., Jensen, K., & Kreklau, H. (1989). Critical thinking handbook: High school. Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University.

19. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

20. Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1986). Protection motivation theory and preventive health: Beyond the health belief model. Health Education Research, 1(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/1.3.153

21. Resolucija o Nacionalnem programu izobraževanja odraslih v Republiki Sloveniji za obdobje 2022–2030 (ReNPIO 22–30). (2022). Ministrstvo za vzgojo in izobraževanje. https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=RESO138

22. Sadar, M., & Erjavec, K. (2021). Zdravstvena pismenost med slovenskimi srednješolci. Pedagoška obzorja, 36(2), 93–108.

23. Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., Brand, H., & HLS-EU Consortium Health Literacy Project European. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12(1), Article 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80

24. Tapper, K. (2021). Health psychology and behaviour change: From science to practice. Macmillan Education.

25. Van Kessel, R., Wong, B. L. H., Clemens, T., & Brand, H. (2022). Digital health literacy as a super determinant of health: More than simply the sum of its parts. Internet Interventions, 27, Article 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100500

26. Vrdelja, M., Vrbovšek, S., & Berzelak, J. (2022). Rezultati Nacionalne raziskave zdravstvene pismenosti v Sloveniji (HLS-SI19). Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

Rupnik Vec, T., & Štemberger Kolnik, T. (2026). Sources of Health Information, Ability to Assess its Credibility, and Interests in Health-Related Content. Journal of Health Sciences, 13(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.55707/jhs.v13i1.199

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.